clay-architecture-variants by jeremylongshore
Coding
945 Stars
114 Forks
Updated Jan 11, 2026, 10:30 PM
Why Use This
This skill provides specialized capabilities for jeremylongshore's codebase.
Use Cases
- Developing new features in the jeremylongshore repository
- Refactoring existing code to follow jeremylongshore standards
- Understanding and working with jeremylongshore's codebase structure
Skill Snapshot
Auto scan of skill assets. Informational only.
Valid SKILL.md
Checks against SKILL.md specification
Source & Community
Repository claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Skill Version
main
Community
945 114
Updated At Jan 11, 2026, 10:30 PM
Skill Stats
SKILL.md 284 Lines
Total Files 1
Total Size 0 B
License MIT
---
name: clay-architecture-variants
description: |
Choose and implement Clay validated architecture blueprints for different scales.
Use when designing new Clay integrations, choosing between monolith/service/microservice
architectures, or planning migration paths for Clay applications.
Trigger with phrases like "clay architecture", "clay blueprint",
"how to structure clay", "clay project layout", "clay microservice".
allowed-tools: Read, Grep
version: 1.0.0
license: MIT
author: Jeremy Longshore <jeremy@intentsolutions.io>
---
# Clay Architecture Variants
## Overview
Three validated architecture blueprints for Clay integrations.
## Prerequisites
- Understanding of team size and DAU requirements
- Knowledge of deployment infrastructure
- Clear SLA requirements
- Growth projections available
## Variant A: Monolith (Simple)
**Best for:** MVPs, small teams, < 10K daily active users
```
my-app/
├── src/
│ ├── clay/
│ │ ├── client.ts # Singleton client
│ │ ├── types.ts # Types
│ │ └── middleware.ts # Express middleware
│ ├── routes/
│ │ └── api/
│ │ └── clay.ts # API routes
│ └── index.ts
├── tests/
│ └── clay.test.ts
└── package.json
```
### Key Characteristics
- Single deployment unit
- Synchronous Clay calls in request path
- In-memory caching
- Simple error handling
### Code Pattern
```typescript
// Direct integration in route handler
app.post('/api/create', async (req, res) => {
try {
const result = await clayClient.create(req.body);
res.json(result);
} catch (error) {
res.status(500).json({ error: error.message });
}
});
```
---
## Variant B: Service Layer (Moderate)
**Best for:** Growing startups, 10K-100K DAU, multiple integrations
```
my-app/
├── src/
│ ├── services/
│ │ ├── clay/
│ │ │ ├── client.ts # Client wrapper
│ │ │ ├── service.ts # Business logic
│ │ │ ├── repository.ts # Data access
│ │ │ └── types.ts
│ │ └── index.ts # Service exports
│ ├── controllers/
│ │ └── clay.ts
│ ├── routes/
│ ├── middleware/
│ ├── queue/
│ │ └── clay-processor.ts # Async processing
│ └── index.ts
├── config/
│ └── clay/
└── package.json
```
### Key Characteristics
- Separation of concerns
- Background job processing
- Redis caching
- Circuit breaker pattern
- Structured error handling
### Code Pattern
```typescript
// Service layer abstraction
class ClayService {
constructor(
private client: ClayClient,
private cache: CacheService,
private queue: QueueService
) {}
async createResource(data: CreateInput): Promise<Resource> {
// Business logic before API call
const validated = this.validate(data);
// Check cache
const cached = await this.cache.get(cacheKey);
if (cached) return cached;
// API call with retry
const result = await this.withRetry(() =>
this.client.create(validated)
);
// Cache result
await this.cache.set(cacheKey, result, 300);
// Async follow-up
await this.queue.enqueue('clay.post-create', result);
return result;
}
}
```
---
## Variant C: Microservice (Complex)
**Best for:** Enterprise, 100K+ DAU, strict SLAs
```
clay-service/ # Dedicated microservice
├── src/
│ ├── api/
│ │ ├── grpc/
│ │ │ └── clay.proto
│ │ └── rest/
│ │ └── routes.ts
│ ├── domain/
│ │ ├── entities/
│ │ ├── events/
│ │ └── services/
│ ├── infrastructure/
│ │ ├── clay/
│ │ │ ├── client.ts
│ │ │ ├── mapper.ts
│ │ │ └── circuit-breaker.ts
│ │ ├── cache/
│ │ ├── queue/
│ │ └── database/
│ └── index.ts
├── config/
├── k8s/
│ ├── deployment.yaml
│ ├── service.yaml
│ └── hpa.yaml
└── package.json
other-services/
├── order-service/ # Calls clay-service
├── payment-service/
└── notification-service/
```
### Key Characteristics
- Dedicated Clay microservice
- gRPC for internal communication
- Event-driven architecture
- Database per service
- Kubernetes autoscaling
- Distributed tracing
- Circuit breaker per service
### Code Pattern
```typescript
// Event-driven with domain isolation
class ClayAggregate {
private events: DomainEvent[] = [];
process(command: ClayCommand): void {
// Domain logic
const result = this.execute(command);
// Emit domain event
this.events.push(new ClayProcessedEvent(result));
}
getUncommittedEvents(): DomainEvent[] {
return [...this.events];
}
}
// Event handler
@EventHandler(ClayProcessedEvent)
class ClayEventHandler {
async handle(event: ClayProcessedEvent): Promise<void> {
// Saga orchestration
await this.sagaOrchestrator.continue(event);
}
}
```
---
## Decision Matrix
| Factor | Monolith | Service Layer | Microservice |
|--------|----------|---------------|--------------|
| Team Size | 1-5 | 5-20 | 20+ |
| DAU | < 10K | 10K-100K | 100K+ |
| Deployment Frequency | Weekly | Daily | Continuous |
| Failure Isolation | None | Partial | Full |
| Operational Complexity | Low | Medium | High |
| Time to Market | Fastest | Moderate | Slowest |
## Migration Path
```
Monolith → Service Layer:
1. Extract Clay code to service/
2. Add caching layer
3. Add background processing
Service Layer → Microservice:
1. Create dedicated clay-service repo
2. Define gRPC contract
3. Add event bus
4. Deploy to Kubernetes
5. Migrate traffic gradually
```
## Instructions
### Step 1: Assess Requirements
Use the decision matrix to identify appropriate variant.
### Step 2: Choose Architecture
Select Monolith, Service Layer, or Microservice based on needs.
### Step 3: Implement Structure
Set up project layout following the chosen blueprint.
### Step 4: Plan Migration Path
Document upgrade path for future scaling.
## Output
- Architecture variant selected
- Project structure implemented
- Migration path documented
- Appropriate patterns applied
## Error Handling
| Issue | Cause | Solution |
|-------|-------|----------|
| Over-engineering | Wrong variant choice | Start simpler |
| Performance issues | Wrong layer | Add caching/async |
| Team friction | Complex architecture | Simplify or train |
| Deployment complexity | Microservice overhead | Consider service layer |
## Examples
### Quick Variant Check
```bash
# Count team size and DAU to select variant
echo "Team: $(git log --format='%ae' | sort -u | wc -l) developers"
echo "DAU: Check analytics dashboard"
```
## Resources
- [Monolith First](https://martinfowler.com/bliki/MonolithFirst.html)
- [Microservices Guide](https://martinfowler.com/microservices/)
- [Clay Architecture Guide](https://docs.clay.com/architecture)
## Next Steps
For common anti-patterns, see `clay-known-pitfalls`. Name Size