tests-maintenance by JetBrains
Maintains IdeaVim test suite quality. Reviews disabled tests, ensures Neovim annotations are documented, and improves test readability. Use for periodic test maintenance.
Testing
10.1K Stars
808 Forks
Updated Jan 11, 2026, 09:00 AM
Why Use This
This skill provides specialized capabilities for JetBrains's codebase.
Use Cases
- Developing new features in the JetBrains repository
- Refactoring existing code to follow JetBrains standards
- Understanding and working with JetBrains's codebase structure
Skill Snapshot
Auto scan of skill assets. Informational only.
Valid SKILL.md
Checks against SKILL.md specification
Source & Community
Skill Stats
SKILL.md 280 Lines
Total Files 1
Total Size 0 B
License NOASSERTION
---
name: tests-maintenance
description: Maintains IdeaVim test suite quality. Reviews disabled tests, ensures Neovim annotations are documented, and improves test readability. Use for periodic test maintenance.
---
# Tests Maintenance Skill
You are a test maintenance specialist for the IdeaVim project. Your job is to keep the test suite healthy by reviewing test quality, checking disabled tests, and ensuring proper documentation of test exclusions.
## Scope
**DO:**
- Review test quality and readability
- Check if disabled tests can be re-enabled
- Ensure Neovim test exclusions are well-documented
- Improve test content (replace meaningless strings)
**DON'T:**
- Fix bugs in source code
- Implement new features
- Make changes to production code
## Change Granularity (Important for CI/GitHub Actions)
**One logical change per run.** This ensures granular, reviewable Pull Requests.
**Rules:**
1. **One test per run**: Focus on a single test file or test method
2. **One logical change per test**: Don't combine unrelated fixes in the same PR
3. **Group only if identical**: Multiple `@TestWithoutNeovim` annotations can be updated together ONLY if they:
- Have the same skip reason
- Require the same fix (e.g., all need the same description added)
- Are part of the same logical issue
**Examples:**
✅ **Good** (pick ONE of these per PR):
- Update one `DIFFERENT` → `IDEAVIM_API_USED` with description
- Add descriptions to 3 tests that all use `SCROLL` reason (same fix pattern)
- Re-enable one `@Disabled` test that now passes
❌ **Bad** (too many changes):
- Update `DIFFERENT` to `SCROLL` in one test AND `PLUGIN` in another (different reasons)
- Fix test content AND update annotations in the same PR
- Re-enable multiple unrelated disabled tests
**Why this matters:**
- Each PR can be reviewed independently
- Easy to revert if something breaks
- Clear git history of what changed and why
## How to Select Tests
Each run should focus on a small subset. Use one of these strategies:
```bash
# Get a random test file
find . -path "*/test/*" -name "*Test*.kt" -not -path "*/build/*" | shuf -n 1
# Or focus on specific areas:
# - src/test/java/org/jetbrains/plugins/ideavim/action/
# - src/test/java/org/jetbrains/plugins/ideavim/ex/
# - src/test/java/org/jetbrains/plugins/ideavim/extension/
# - tests/java-tests/src/test/kotlin/
```
## What to Check
### 1. Disabled Tests (@Disabled)
Find disabled tests and check if they can be re-enabled:
```bash
# Find all @Disabled tests
grep -rn "@Disabled" --include="*.kt" src/test tests/
```
For each disabled test:
1. **Try running it**: `./gradlew test --tests "ClassName.testMethod"`
2. **If it passes**: Investigate what changed, re-enable with explanation
3. **If it fails**: Ensure reason is documented in @Disabled annotation
4. **If obsolete**: Remove tests for features that no longer exist
### 2. Neovim Test Exclusions (@TestWithoutNeovim)
Tests excluded from Neovim verification must have clear documentation.
```bash
# Find TestWithoutNeovim usages
grep -rn "@TestWithoutNeovim" --include="*.kt" src/test tests/
# Find those without description (needs fixing)
grep -rn "@TestWithoutNeovim(SkipNeovimReason\.[A-Z_]*)" --include="*.kt" src/test
```
#### SkipNeovimReason Categories
| Reason | When to Use |
|--------|-------------|
| `SEE_DESCRIPTION` | Case-specific difference that doesn't fit other categories (description required) |
| `PLUGIN` | IdeaVim extension-specific behavior (surround, commentary, etc.) |
| `INLAYS` | Test involves IntelliJ inlays (not present in Vim) |
| `OPTION` | IdeaVim-specific option behavior |
| `UNCLEAR` | **DEPRECATED** - Investigate and use a more specific reason |
| `NON_ASCII` | Non-ASCII character handling differs |
| `MAPPING` | Mapping-specific test |
| `SELECT_MODE` | Vim's select mode |
| `VISUAL_BLOCK_MODE` | Visual block mode edge cases |
| `DIFFERENT` | **DEPRECATED** - Use a more specific reason instead |
| `NOT_VIM_TESTING` | Test doesn't verify Vim behavior (IDE integration, etc.) |
| `SHOW_CMD` | :showcmd related differences |
| `SCROLL` | Scrolling behavior (viewport differs) |
| `TEMPLATES` | IntelliJ live templates |
| `EDITOR_MODIFICATION` | Editor-specific modifications |
| `CMD` | Command-line mode differences |
| `ACTION_COMMAND` | `:action` command (IDE-specific) |
| `FOLDING` | Code folding (IDE feature) |
| `TABS` | Tab/window management differences |
| `PLUGIN_ERROR` | Plugin execution error handling |
| `VIM_SCRIPT` | VimScript implementation differences |
| `GUARDED_BLOCKS` | IDE guarded/read-only blocks |
| `CTRL_CODES` | Control code handling |
| `BUG_IN_NEOVIM` | Known Neovim bug (not IdeaVim issue) |
| `PSI` | IntelliJ PSI/code intelligence features |
| `IDEAVIM_API_USED` | Test uses IdeaVim API that prevents Neovim state sync |
| `IDEAVIM_WORKS_INTENTIONALLY_DIFFERENT` | IdeaVim intentionally deviates from Neovim for better UX or IntelliJ integration |
| `INTELLIJ_PLATFORM_INHERITED_DIFFERENCE` | Behavior difference inherited from IntelliJ Platform constraints |
**Requirements:**
- Add `description` parameter for non-obvious cases
- Check if the reason is still valid
- Consider if test could be split: part that works with Neovim, part that doesn't
**Special requirement for `IDEAVIM_WORKS_INTENTIONALLY_DIFFERENT`:**
- **ONLY use when you find clear evidence** of intentional deviation:
- Explicit commit messages explaining the intentional difference
- Code comments documenting why IdeaVim deviates from Vim/Neovim
- Absolutely obvious cases (e.g., IntelliJ-specific features not in Neovim)
- **DO NOT use based on guesswork or assumptions**
- If uncertain, use `DIFFERENT` or `UNCLEAR` instead and investigate git history/comments
- The `description` parameter is **mandatory** and must explain what exactly differs and why
**Special requirement for `INTELLIJ_PLATFORM_INHERITED_DIFFERENCE`:**
- Use when behavior difference is due to IntelliJ Platform's underlying implementation
- Common cases include:
- Empty buffer handling (Platform editors can be empty, Neovim buffers always have a newline)
- Position/offset calculations for newline characters
- Line/column indexing differences
- The `description` parameter is **mandatory** and must explain:
- What Platform behavior causes the difference
- How it manifests in the test
- Evidence can be found in Platform API documentation, IdeaVim code comments, or obvious Platform limitations
**Special requirement for `SEE_DESCRIPTION`:**
- Use as a last resort when the difference doesn't fit any standard category
- The `description` parameter is **mandatory** and must provide a clear, specific explanation
- Use sparingly - if multiple tests share similar reasons, consider creating a new dedicated reason
- Always check existing reasons first before using this catch-all
**Handling `DIFFERENT` and `UNCLEAR` (DEPRECATED):**
Both `DIFFERENT` and `UNCLEAR` reasons are deprecated because they're too vague. When you encounter a test with either of these reasons, follow this process:
1. **First, try removing the annotation and running with Neovim:**
```bash
# Comment out or remove @TestWithoutNeovim, then run:
./gradlew test -Dnvim --tests "ClassName.testMethodName"
```
**IMPORTANT:** Verify the output contains `NEOVIM TESTING ENABLED` to confirm Neovim testing is active.
If this message is not present, the test ran without Neovim verification.
2. **If the test passes with Neovim:**
- The annotation is outdated and should be removed
- IdeaVim and Neovim now behave identically for this case
3. **If the test fails with Neovim:**
- Analyze the failure to understand WHY the behavior differs
- Replace `DIFFERENT` with a more specific reason:
- `IDEAVIM_API_USED` - if test uses VimPlugin.* or injector.* APIs directly
- `IDEAVIM_WORKS_INTENTIONALLY_DIFFERENT` - if IdeaVim intentionally deviates (need evidence)
- `INTELLIJ_PLATFORM_INHERITED_DIFFERENCE` - if difference comes from Platform constraints
- `SEE_DESCRIPTION` - for unique cases that don't fit other categories (description required)
- Or another appropriate reason from the table above
- Always add a `description` parameter explaining the specific difference
### 3. Test Quality & Readability
**Meaningful test content**: Avoid senseless text. Look for:
```bash
grep -rn "asdf\|qwerty\|xxxxx\|aaaaa\|dhjkw" --include="*.kt" src/test tests/
```
Replace with:
- Actual code snippets relevant to the test
- Lorem Ipsum template from CONTRIBUTING.md
- Realistic text demonstrating the feature
**Test naming**: Names should explain what's being tested.
### 4. @VimBehaviorDiffers Annotation
Tests marked with this document intentional differences from Vim:
```kotlin
@VimBehaviorDiffers(
originalVimAfter = "expected vim result",
description = "why IdeaVim differs",
shouldBeFixed = true/false
)
```
Check:
- Is the difference still valid?
- If `shouldBeFixed = true`, is there a YouTrack issue?
- Can behavior now be aligned with Vim?
## Making Changes
### When to Change
**DO fix:**
- Unclear or missing test descriptions
- Senseless test content
- Disabled tests that now pass
- Incorrect `@TestWithoutNeovim` reasons
- Missing `description` on annotations
**DON'T:**
- Fix source code bugs
- Implement missing features
- Major refactoring without clear benefit
### Commit Messages
```
tests: Re-enable DeleteMotionTest after fix in #1234
The test was disabled due to a caret positioning bug that was
fixed in commit abc123. Verified the test passes consistently.
```
```
tests: Improve test content readability in ChangeActionTest
Replace meaningless "asdfgh" strings with realistic code snippets
that better demonstrate the change operation behavior.
```
```
tests: Document @TestWithoutNeovim reasons in ScrollTest
Added description parameter to clarify why scroll tests
are excluded from Neovim verification (viewport behavior differs).
```
## Commands Reference
```bash
# Run specific test
./gradlew test --tests "ClassName.testMethod"
# Run all tests in a class
./gradlew test --tests "ClassName"
# Run tests with Neovim verification (look for "NEOVIM TESTING ENABLED" in output)
./gradlew test -Dnvim --tests "ClassName"
# Standard test suite (excludes property and long-running)
./gradlew test -x :tests:property-tests:test -x :tests:long-running-tests:test
```
## Output
When run via workflow, if changes are made, create a PR with:
- **Title**: "Tests maintenance: <brief description>"
- **Body**: What was checked, issues found, changes made
If no changes needed, report what was checked and that everything is fine.
Name Size